We’re standing up for Kiwi independence by pushing for a citizens-initiated referendum to decide whether New Zealand should remain in the World Health Organization (WHO). This is about protecting our sovereignty and making health decisions that are right for us.
It’s your voice in action. By gathering enough public support, we can force Parliament to debate and take action on this issue, giving everyday New Zealanders a say in our future.
A Citizens Initiated Referendum is different from an online petition. By law, all signatures must be in wet ink, meaning they have to be handwritten with a pen on the official forms we provide. This is to ensure that every signature is verified as coming from a registered voter in New Zealand.
We need 400,000 "wet ink" signatures by 25 November 2025 to get this in front of Parliament. Achieving this will ensure the referendum is taken seriously and the conversation about reclaiming our independence happens at the highest level. This is your chance to make a real difference!
Download the form from the "Sign the Referendum" button. Print it off and get friends and family to sign and return to us.
The WHO has faced criticism for its handling of major health crises, including allegations of a lack of transparency, conflicts of interest, and prioritising political considerations over scientific evidence. Concerns have also been raised about its “one-size-fits-all” approach, which may not always align with New Zealand’s unique needs and priorities. By exiting the WHO, New Zealand can:
Prioritise Kiwis' Health: Make decisions tailored to the health challenges and demographics specific to New Zealand, rather than adhering to policies designed for a global context.
Regain Decision-Making Independence: Ensure that public health policies are determined by New Zealanders for New Zealanders, without being influenced by international agendas or external donors with vested interests.
Promote Transparency and Accountability: Create a system that creates openness and accountability, ensuring decisions are based on evidence and what is best for New Zealand.
Exiting the WHO doesn’t mean abandoning global health collaboration. Instead, it provides an opportunity to establish partnerships and initiatives that better reflect New Zealand’s values and health priorities.
The WHO’s "one-size-fits-all" policies often ignore national and individual health needs. Agreements like the proposed Pandemic Treaty could limit local decision-making and burden taxpayers.
Once state-funded, the WHO now relies on private donors for 88% of its budget, with 10% from a single donor. Its 2024 investment round sought $7.1 billion, estimating a $35 return per $1 invested. Funds often support ideologically possessed vanity projects rather than core health priorities. Investors can invest in climate change or gender equity healthcare.
Large donors earmark funds for specific projects, giving them undue influence. These directed contributions can generate external profits for donors, while governments lose decision-making power. The WHO reportedly controls only 25% of its budget yet significantly impacts New Zealand’s health policies.
Established in 2020 without formal member state consultation, the WHO Foundation facilitates private investment. It partners with venture capitalists like Our Crowd, attracting investors seeking returns. Donors include Pfizer and Merck, raising concerns about corporate influence.
The WHO increasingly operates behind closed doors, bypassing its own rules. Amendments to International Health Regulations (IHRs) were drafted in private, with member states given insufficient time to review before voting in breach of the constitution.
New Zealand taxpayers fund the WHO through assessed and voluntary contributions, yet even specific government departments claim they cannot tracktotal spending over the past 25 years. The cost of implementing new IHRs and the Pandemic Treaty remains unknown. A global study estimated IHR implementation at $124 billion over five years—a major concern given New Zealand’s $1.4 billion dollar health deficit.
Swine Flu (2009) WHO’s declaration led to overreaction, costly vaccinations, and $31 million spent in NZ for 69 deaths.
Ebola (2014-16) Delayed response worsened the crisis.
COVID-19: Rigid policies caused economic and social harm, ignoring alternative, localised solutions that could have been more effective for New Zealand. $58.4 billion was allocated from the CRRF before its closure in Budget 2022.
Misuse of Funds & Sexual Abuse: The WHO has also faced misuse of funds and sexual abuse scandals.
Exiting the WHO would allow New Zealand to redirect funds toward hospital waitlists, mental health, and cancer care. The U.S. withdrew in 2020 with no adverse effects and has exited again in 2025.
The WHO’s ties to pharmaceutical companies raise concerns about biased recommendations. Industry-linked advisors risk shaping policies that prioritize profits over public health.
Concerns persist over the CCP’s growing influence on WHO priorities and decision-making.
Exiting the WHO means New Zealand would no longer be bound by its policies, recommendations, or agreements, such as the International Health Regulations. This allows New Zealand to independently develop and implement health strategies that better suit its population’s needs.
Here’s what it could look like in practice:
Independent Pandemic Preparedness: New Zealand would take full control of its pandemic planning and responses, ensuring that measures reflect domestic realities rather than global directives.
Customised Public Health Policies: Health initiatives could be designed to address New Zealand’s specific challenges, such as addressing non-communicable diseases like cancer and heart disease, which are leading causes of death.
Funding Allocation: Resources could be redirected toward locally driven health programmes, research, and infrastructure, rather than contributing to an international organisation with competing priorities.
While this is a significant decision, it’s ultimately about putting Kiwis at the centre of every health policy decision and ensuring that New Zealand has the flexibility to respond effectively to its own unique challenges.
No, leaving the WHO does not mean isolating ourselves from the world. Many countries operate independently of the WHO’s framework while still maintaining strong global partnerships. Exiting the WHO is about ensuring that New Zealand’s sovereignty and decision-making are not compromised by external pressures, particularly in areas where policies might conflict with our national interests or values.
New Zealand already has public health infrastructure and the ability to coordinate directly with other countries and organisations. Exiting the WHO would free us to choose partnerships and strategies that best suit our needs, without relying on a one-size-fits-all approach. We would also retain access to global scientific research, which isn’t exclusive to the WHO.
New Zealand currently contributes millions to the WHO annually. By exiting, those funds could be redirected toward strengthening our healthcare system and investing in independent health initiatives. We would also avoid future costs tied to WHO-mandated programmes that may not align with New Zealand’s priorities.
There are rules around signing a referendum petition. To sign the referendum petition, you must:
1) be registered on the New Zealand electoral roll; and
2) provide your full name and address alongside your “wet ink” signature.
All signatures must be on the form which has been approved by Parliament. Other signatures or signing online will not count towards the required number.
Download the signature form under the Resource Tab and start collecting signatures. If you are having trouble printing the signature form to size, please click into your settings and make sure the scale is set to print to fit page.
Please send the original signed form back to KM Law Limited
738 Cameron Road, Tauranga 3112 or PO Box 9457, Greerton, Tauranga, 3142
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Under the referendum rules we cannot spend more than $50,000 promoting and gathering signatures for the referendum petition. This makes it difficult to get the word out there.
You can help by signing up to be a volunteer, downloading the approved form and collecting friends and family signatures, taking an advertisement in your local paper, connecting us with influencers or well known people that wish to help spread the word etc.
If you wish to advertise the petition you are welcome to do so. Please note that the rules prevent us from providing you with material for any such advertisement. However, we are more than happy to discuss any advertising with you.
Your donations will help us spread the word. Every donation is valuable given we must collect approximately 400,000 signatures by 24 November 2025. We will publish the total amount of donations received to be transparent.